Inference for categorical data (chi-square tests).Two-sample inference for the difference between groups.Significance tests (hypothesis testing).Counting, permutations, and combinations.Displaying and comparing quantitative data.
Non-right triangles & trigonometry (Advanced).Exponents, radicals, and scientific notation.Equations, expressions, and inequalities.Transformations, congruence, and similarity.Negative numbers: multiplication and division.
Negative numbers: addition and subtraction. Multi-digit multiplication and division. Arithmetic patterns and problem solving. Equivalent fractions and comparing fractions. And they’re even better than traditional math worksheets – more instantaneous, more interactive, and more fun! Just choose your grade level or topic to get access to 100% free practice questions: There should be some (perhaps minor) speed up for MathJax just by loading a smaller set of features.That’s because Khan Academy has over 100,000 free practice questions. Whether that contributes to the speed-up I don't know, but I find it somewhat disingenuous that on the KaTeX test page they chose to use the TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML configuration (which accepts both LaTeX-style and MathML input and outputs to configurable HTML or MathML output) instead of the TeX-AMS_HTML configuration (which is still more feature-rich than what KaTeX provides, but is a better approximation of what KaTeX supports). One interesting aspect which is related to KaTeX's claim that it runs on all major web browsers with identical output, is that KaTeX outputs are, as far as I can tell, only using the HTML-CSS paradigm. I am also not entirely convinced that when feature parity is reached, KaTeX will still exhibit the same speed-up compared to MathJax, since both are based on a JavaScript backend. Very limited support for basic elementary set theory and logic notations.Īlso I am not particularly impressed with how they deal with really long math expressions (scroll bar rather than overflow or line break). The lack of \mathbb and \mathrm commands (at least one of our 100K users will not stand for the lack of the latter :-)). Until feature parity is achieved we cannot expect KaTeX to be a drop-in replacement.Ī few specific things missing that will break many of the pages on Math.SE at the moment: Mathjax also supports environments defined in the AMSMath (loaded by default here) and AMSCD extensions which involve vertical alignment. Currently, the link given in Lipis's comment shows around ~250 commands supported. For comparison: MathJax supports on the order of ~800 built-in commands, plus the ability to define new macros using \def or \newcommand. At present: I do not think KaTeX is yet a viable option.
0 kommentar(er)
